Foreword
In the past two decades, due to the rapid development of communication technology, computer technology and network technology, the field of industrial automation control has also been rapidly improved and reformed. Automation engineers not only boldly apply this new technology to industrial practice. At the same time, there has been a fierce debate in the academic field, and its focus is nothing more than:
* Various fieldbus technology disputes
* Technology dispute between PC-based controller and PLC controller
* Fieldbus and Industrial Ethernet technology battles
After nearly two decades of debate, the fieldbus has been finalized. The eight buses are summarized in an international standard of IEC 61158. This standard is not only the comparison of the application of technology, but also the economic interests of countries. The standards are incompatible with each other and become an international standard without uniform standards. It seems that the pure technical standards of OPC are obviously not feasible in the TC 65 committee. At the same time, the debate between PC-based controllers and PLC controllers has been held for more than a decade, and the PLC controller manufacturer expressed support for the development of PC-based controllers, but more of a wait-and-see attitude, while PC-based The new development plant of the controller, due to its small size, small market and shortage of funds, has always been at a disadvantage. Only when waiting for the awakening of large companies will a new situation emerge. The only thing that is gratifying is that the International Standards Organization has not adopted one or several controllers as an international standard, and it has left a glimmer of hope for those who are engaged in automatic control, and strive to engage in new technologies and new products. Recently, new signs have emerged in the field of PC control technology. The new industrial controller dispute has to be launched, that is, the dispute between PAC and PLC. The origin of this new debate is precisely related to the application and development of industrial Ethernet technology in the field of control. .
In fact, it is the debate on how to apply modern communication technology to industrial automation control issues. A deeper analysis is the debate over the widely used fieldbus and the growing industrial Ethernet technology. Fieldbus is opposed to the industrial Ethernet access control system's field layer to maintain its position in the field layer signal transmission, and new The Industrial Ethernet faction underestimates the role of the fieldbus and makes Industrial Ethernet technology a godsend. What is the end of the network, transparent network, etc., the original fieldbus group used their priority in the international standard, first extended the IEC 61158 bus system to the Ethernet field, both the FF bus developed into HSE, ControlNet developed into EtherNet /IP, Profibus and Interbus have jointly developed into ProfiNet, and World-FIP has automatically withdrawn from the historical arena. More than the original field bus, or no opportunity to enter the fieldbus standard, but also to develop industrial Ethernet technology directly into the standard of industrial communications. Such as Modbus-TCP, PowerLink, EtherCat and EPA in China have become PAS files.
IEC 61158 evolved into IEC 61784-1
Bus Foundation FF developed into HSE
ControlNet develops into EtherNet/IP
Profibus and Interbus develop into ProfiNet
IEC 61784 does not exclude the addition of new technologies
Modbus-TCP, PowerLink, EtherCat, EPA. . (PAS)
It turns out that the development of modern automatic control is closely related to the development of modern communication technology. Both fieldbus and industrial Ethernet play a decisive role in the decentralization, digitization and intelligent integration of industrial control systems. So looking at the above arguments is a great inspiration for how we think about the rapid development of industrial Ethernet technology. In the debate, we need to understand the different industrial Ethernet technologies and make a corresponding comparison. This will clarify the impact of future industrial Ethernet technology on industrial control systems. The following is a brief description of several industrial Ethernet technologies that are currently discussed.
About Silicone Glass Markers:
Sometimes we like to invite our friends to hold a party at home ,we usually prepare lots of drinks put them in the same cup.But,there are many people in house,someone might take the wrong cup,it's an embrrassed thing.Is there anything can use to mark the cup?
Silicone is useful,it can produce Silicone Cup marker.They are suitable for parties,you can have your own idea on markers,for example,we can use pumpkin shape marker when in a Halloween theme party.Most important,it can prevent people take the wrong cup.
It's good item,which is not only durable in use,but also fashionable in design.
Silicone glass markers introduction:
1.Product name:Silicone Glass Markers,Silicone Drink Markers, Wine Glass Charms ,Silicone Wine Markers, Silicone Wine Charms , Wholesale Wine Charms
2.Place of origin:Guangdong China
3.Color:any pantone color
4.Logo:Printing,debossed,embossed
5.MOQ:500pcs.
6.Package:1 pcs/opp,customized design is available.
7.Design:Customized/stock
8.Certification:FDA,LFGB,SGS,ROHS,etc.
9.Usage:Use for glass mark
10.Silicone glass markers photos for reference.
Silicone Glass Markers,Silicone Drink Markers,Wine Glass Charms,Silicone Wine Markers,Silicone Wine Charms,Wholesale Wine Charms
OK Silicone Gift Co., Ltd. , https://www.oemsiliconegift.com